Backend Engineer · Senior
test_voice_check_001
The candidate provided extremely short, fragmented, and largely incoherent responses to basic questions about a Python project they claimed to have built. There is no demonstrable evidence of Python proficiency, system design thinking, or senior-level engineering experience. The interview effectively did not progress past introductory questions.
“We have used the entropic analysis.”
Garbled reference to Anthropic — suggests unfamiliarity with the tool they claim to have used in their own project.
“Yes, basically I am managing this in passing type of communications.”
After a 10.8s pause, response is vague and grammatically broken, with no technical substance about conversation state or async handling.
Hello
Hey, good to meet you! Ready to dive in when you are. So let's start with Python since that's the core of this role. Tell me about a Python project you've worked on recently — something meaty, where you really had to think hard about how you structured things.
Basically
Created AI Voice Agent
Oh nice, those are fun to build — lots of moving parts. What was the core of it, like what was the Python stack underneath?
We have used the entropic analysis.
Interesting — sorry, did you say "entropic" analysis, or were you referring to Anthropic, like the Claude API?
I'm referring to cloud entropy AI.
Got it, so Anthropic's Claude. Cool. What did the Python side look like — were you doing async stuff, managing conversation state, that kind of thing?
Yes, basically I am managing this in passing type of communications.
Right, so like passing messages back and forth. How did you handle the async side of it — were you using asyncio, or something like FastAPI under the hood?
First API.
Nice, FastAPI's a solid choice for that. So when you're managing conversation state across those voice turns — where were you actually
First Step
Sorry, can you say that again? I think it cut off a bit.
Sorry
No worries!
Okay, please repeat it.
Veera Supriyo